
Design Science is a problem solving approach which entails a rigorous, systematic study of the deliberate ordering of the components in our Universe. Fuller believed that this study needs to be comprehensive in order to gain a global perspective when pursuing solutions to problems humanity is facing.
"The function of what I call design science is to solve problems by introducing into the environment new artifacts, the availability of which will induce their spontaneous employment by humans and thus, coincidentally, cause humans to abandon their previous problem-producing behaviors and devices. For example, when humans have a vital need to cross the roaring rapids of a river, as a design scientist I would design them a bridge, causing them, I am sure, to abandon spontaneously and forever the risking of their lives by trying to swim to the other shore."
—R. Buckminster Fuller from Cosmography

Design Science: A Framework for Change by Michael Ben- Eli
During the last quarter century, Buckminster Fuller's concept of Design Science has come to mean different things to different people, evolving in the process into a potent combination of method, metaphor and myth.
The purpose of this document is to refocus the concept, address it in the context of some reflections about design in general, and link Design Science to the sustainability challenge facing humanity today.
click to download: Design Science: A Framework for Change by Michael Ben-Eli [pdf 4.1mb]
Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science
Toward the end of Buckminster Fuller's last public speaking engagement on June 26, 1983 he said, "People often ask me what I want to be remembered for. I don't want to be remembered. I'm not doing what I do to be remembered. I do hope what I've been able to discover and get out on paper, printed, will be read, and the significance will be appreciated. But I don't care about them appreciating me doing it. I want the people to appreciate the significance of it. So they'll act that way."
And people often asked Buckminster Fuller just what exactly he was and did. Sometimes he would respond to the first part of the question with the now oft-quoted statement, "I am not a noun -- I seem to be a verb." In answering the second part he would most importantly insist that he was not a specialist and would put forward his alternative, that he was a comprehensivist. Just as often he would refer to himself as a Design Scientist.
And so the phrase Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science emerged as perhaps the generic description of the initiative of Bucky Fuller.
So what is Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science (CADS)? It is certainly a mouthful. Or should we say a mind-full. Throughout his life, Buckminster Fuller described CADS in various ways, at various times, to various people. Toward a comprehensive definition of CADS, in this section we look at some of the things he said. We also look at the ways some people picked up the concept of Design Science, in print, and ran with it.
In this section some of our associates--including some of Bucky's friends, family and students--have defined Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science, and speculated on its relevance, now and in the future. As always we welcome your thoughts.
See also:

» Introduction to Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science by Greg Watson
» Read an Introduction to Design Science by Amy Edmondson, author of A Fuller Explanation
» R. Buckminster Fuller on Design Science
» Curricula and the Design Initiative | Design Strategy by RBF
» 'What I am Trying to Do' — by Buckminster Fuller
» Design as Savior, Designer as Slave — article by J. Baldwin, author of BuckyWorks
» Design Science in the 1990's and beyond
» Bucky on Design Science - Audio
» Read more postings in our Design Science section on bfi.org






